Skip to main content

Nature VS. Nurture

                                                                    Nature VS Nurture



 Have you thought about how you got your personality? Nature VS Nurture is a very good debatable idea that comes in everyones mind. Nature means genetic and nurture means acquired. This debatable idea is studied by psychiatrists that mostly study twins who have never seen each other or didn't know their twin even existed.



   Nature refers to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence your behavior. Twins that have never seen each other are  the best candidates to be tested to check if nature determines your behavior. Plato and Descartes are very good philosophers who believe that certain things are inborn in the environment around you, yet are in your genes. Examples of things that are inherited are your eye color, diseases, hair color and many other physical descriptions.


       Nurture refers to all of the environmental variables that influence your personality as well. Changing someone's country is a great example of seeing if his/her personality changed. John B. Watson believed that you can do anything if you are taught how to do it regardless of your genes. Everyone'a behavior changes through the behavior of others according to Albert Bandura's theory.


  Both Nature and Nurture play a critical role in ones personality. Pitch of musical voices and height are both natural and acquired. Pitch is because if you are living in an environment where people like singing you will become good at singing , and its acquired because you can have a family with very good singers so you'll inherit their singing skills. Another example is your height, you can have a family with really tall people in it, though in an environment that is not healthy so you wouldn't be tall. In my opinion, I believe that your personality changes with a nurture effect.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who was Socrates? What is the Socratic method?

Who was Socrates? What is the Socratic method? Socrates was a philosopher known as "the father of philosophy". He was known to teach, yet he only taught 3 students because it was in the old ages. Socrates didn't write anything down and all the information we know now are from the students he taught before. Socrates was a classical Greek philosopher credited as one of the founders of Western philosophy, and as being the first moral philosopher, of the Western ethical tradition of thought. Socrates wasn't only known for philosophy but known for Greek Western Philosophy. He was also the first moral philosopher.  Socrates didn't give up philosophy even after he was given a death sentence. He was hated by everyone in his town because of his sayings. He believed that only the people who believe they don't know are the intelligent ones. " The only true wisdom is in knowing that you know nothing" -- a quote that Socrates used to tell Plato and the 2 ...

The Danger of a Single Story - TedTalk

  The Danger of a Single Story       This TedTalk is about a girl from Nigeria, who has lived there up until she had to leave home to study abroad in the US. She talks about how she used to judge her new house boy because the only image she had of him was that he was poor. Then, when she went to college in the US, her roommate judged her based off of the idea that she is from Nigeria. However, as she got to know her, the roommate then realized that they have a lot of similarities.      Relating why she was telling these stories, she focuses on the fact that a single/ one sided story  isn't going to lead to anything throughout the whole TedTalk. In my opinion, it is exactly like a story with different perspectives. Listening to only one side of a story, is as useless as having just one pair of a shoe. For example. the roommate was only listening to what she was hearing from the people around her, and seeing on social media. These were all a si...

Grit - spoken by Angela Lee Duckworth

  Grit        Angela Lee talks about something I've always believed in. That is that the students who are doing better in school than others, doesn't necessarily mean they are smarter. I've always believed in that because the students who do better in school are the ones that are only able to memorize, rather than actually understand. They are not trying to better themselves with knowledge that they can seek by themselves. They take the knowledge from their teachers and just apply it on tests.           Not that I wasn't one of these students, I very much were. I sued to study just for the sake of passing, nit worrying about if I'll remember the things I've learned after applying it on the tests and quizzes. However, as I've grown and realized that I was passing school in a very wrong way, I changed that habit. A very big part of changing that habit was changing school systems. Everytime I talked with anyone about school systems, th...